Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S269801AbUJHO1L (ORCPT ); Fri, 8 Oct 2004 10:27:11 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S269991AbUJHO1L (ORCPT ); Fri, 8 Oct 2004 10:27:11 -0400 Received: from jade.aracnet.com ([216.99.193.136]:51105 "EHLO jade.spiritone.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S269801AbUJHO1G (ORCPT ); Fri, 8 Oct 2004 10:27:06 -0400 Date: Fri, 08 Oct 2004 07:26:04 -0700 From: "Martin J. Bligh" To: Erich Focht , Andrew Morton cc: pj@sgi.com, Simon.Derr@bull.net, colpatch@us.ibm.com, pwil3058@bigpond.net.au, frankeh@watson.ibm.com, dipankar@in.ibm.com, ckrm-tech@lists.sourceforge.net, lse-tech@lists.sourceforge.net, hch@infradead.org, steiner@sgi.com, jbarnes@sgi.com, sylvain.jeaugey@bull.net, djh@sgi.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, ak@suse.de, sivanich@sgi.com Subject: Re: [Lse-tech] [PATCH] cpusets - big numa cpu and memory placement Message-ID: <1382520000.1097245562@[10.10.2.4]> In-Reply-To: <200410081240.26482.efocht@hpce.nec.com> References: <20040805100901.3740.99823.84118@sam.engr.sgi.com> <200410081123.45762.efocht@hpce.nec.com> <20041008025034.3deedac5.akpm@osdl.org> <200410081240.26482.efocht@hpce.nec.com> X-Mailer: Mulberry/2.2.1 (Linux/x86) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 530 Lines: 14 > Anyhow, I'd say we > already have a business case here. And instead of pushing ISVs to > support the SGI way of doing this, the Bull way and the NEC way, it > makes more sense to ask them to support the LINUX way. Right. But we're trying to work out what the Linux way *is* ;-) M. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/