Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Fri, 20 Apr 2001 07:56:41 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Fri, 20 Apr 2001 07:56:30 -0400 Received: from mail2.bonn-fries.net ([62.140.6.78]:8972 "HELO mail2.bonn-fries.net") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id ; Fri, 20 Apr 2001 07:56:20 -0400 From: Daniel Phillips To: Andreas Dilger , Ext2 development mailing list , Linux kernel development list Subject: Re: [Ext2-devel] [PATCH] update ext2 documentation Date: Fri, 20 Apr 2001 14:07:34 +0200 X-Mailer: KMail [version 1.0.28] Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII In-Reply-To: <200104201016.f3KAGwct030395@webber.adilger.int> In-Reply-To: <200104201016.f3KAGwct030395@webber.adilger.int> MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <01042014132609.01958@subspace.radio> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, 20 Apr 2001, Andreas Dilger wrote: > The included patch updates Documentation/filesystems/ext2 to reflect > current information about ext2. It also adds some more information > that people have told me is hard to find in other places (such as a > description of the superblock compatibility flags, file and filesystem > size limits). To quote Oliver Twist: "Please, Sir, I want some more". How about a explanation of the significance of GOOD_OLD_REV, etc. In particular, I'm curious why CURRENT_REV is defined as GOOD_OLD_REV and not DYNAMIC_REV. -- Daniel - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/