Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S269127AbUJKQCE (ORCPT ); Mon, 11 Oct 2004 12:02:04 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S269043AbUJKP6N (ORCPT ); Mon, 11 Oct 2004 11:58:13 -0400 Received: from ipx20189.ipxserver.de ([80.190.249.56]:45445 "EHLO ipx20189.ipxserver.de") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S269065AbUJKP5w (ORCPT ); Mon, 11 Oct 2004 11:57:52 -0400 Date: Mon, 11 Oct 2004 18:58:01 +0300 (EAT) From: Zwane Mwaikambo To: Andi Kleen Cc: Andrew Morton , Linux Kernel Subject: Re: 2.6.9-rc4-mm1 In-Reply-To: <20041011154934.GD26350@wotan.suse.de> Message-ID: References: <20041011032502.299dc88d.akpm@osdl.org> <20041011154934.GD26350@wotan.suse.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 824 Lines: 24 On Mon, 11 Oct 2004, Andi Kleen wrote: > On Mon, Oct 11, 2004 at 06:47:45PM +0300, Zwane Mwaikambo wrote: > > How about the following? > > > > remove-lock_section-from-x86_64-spin_lock-asm.patch > > remove LOCK_SECTION from x86_64 spin_lock asm > > > > allow-x86_64-to-reenable-interrupts-on-contention.patch > > Allow x86_64 to reenable interrupts on contention > > > > The former is a fix. > > What does it fix? Well we don't have lock section anymore since the spinlock text is all in the out of line functions. So this was really something i missed in my sweep. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/