Subject: Re: Linux 2.6.9-rc4 - pls test (and no more patches)
From: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@SteelEye.com>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
Cc: Andre Tomt <andre@tomt.net>,
       Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.58.0410110758500.3897@ppc970.osdl.org>
References: <Pine.LNX.4.58.0410102016180.3897@ppc970.osdl.org>
	<416A53D3.9020002@tomt.net> 
	<Pine.LNX.4.58.0410110758500.3897@ppc970.osdl.org>
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Date: 11 Oct 2004 10:09:35 -0500
Message-Id: <1097507381.2029.40.camel@mulgrave>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 1231
Lines: 30

On Mon, 2004-10-11 at 10:02, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> 
> 
> On Mon, 11 Oct 2004, Andre Tomt wrote:
> > 
> > The data corruption bug in the new megaraid driver version seems still 
> > not to be fixed. LSI posted a fix some weeks ago, not sure how that went..
> > 
> > "[PATCH]: megaraid 2.20.4: Fixes a data corruption bug"
> 
> I think that one is already in the SCSI BK tree, just not pushed to me. 
> Perhaps because the tree contains other less important patches that James 
> doesn't think are worthy yet.. James? Should I just take the small 
> megaraid patch directly (and leave the compat ioctl cleanups etc to you)?

I have no objections.  However, I was planning on pushing it through the
SCSI tree because it's in the new megaraid driver which is experimental
at the moment (the old megaraid driver is still in and still
selectable).  It's been in -mm for a few days now with no ill effects, I
think, but I'm not sure how many megaraid owners have actually tested
it.

James


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/