Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S269193AbUJKT3q (ORCPT ); Mon, 11 Oct 2004 15:29:46 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S269198AbUJKT3q (ORCPT ); Mon, 11 Oct 2004 15:29:46 -0400 Received: from stat16.steeleye.com ([209.192.50.48]:34713 "EHLO hancock.sc.steeleye.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S269193AbUJKT3p (ORCPT ); Mon, 11 Oct 2004 15:29:45 -0400 Subject: Re: Linux 2.6.9-rc4 - pls test (and no more patches) From: James Bottomley To: Andre Tomt Cc: Linus Torvalds , Kernel Mailing List In-Reply-To: <416ACF5E.80407@tomt.net> References: <416A53D3.9020002@tomt.ne t> <1097507381.2029.40.camel@mulgrave> <416ACF5E.80407@tomt.net> Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.0.8 (1.0.8-9) Date: 11 Oct 2004 14:29:27 -0500 Message-Id: <1097522974.2029.161.camel@mulgrave> Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 864 Lines: 19 On Mon, 2004-10-11 at 13:22, Andre Tomt wrote: > I've been running 2.20.3.1 + the data corruption bug fix on megaraids > ranging from low-end SATA adapters to the u320scsi ones for a while on a > 2.6.8 based kernel, nothing have blown up yet. The old 2.20.3.1 without > the fix have been holding up too though - however having a known data > corruption bug lingering doesn't feel so good :-) Yes, well, that's one of the things that worries me slightly ... no-one has reported the data corruption that the patch claims to fix. That's one of the reasons I was planning to take it through the normal cycle. James - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/