Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Fri, 20 Apr 2001 09:36:33 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Fri, 20 Apr 2001 09:36:24 -0400 Received: from snark.tuxedo.org ([207.106.50.26]:10768 "EHLO snark.thyrsus.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Fri, 20 Apr 2001 09:36:12 -0400 Date: Fri, 20 Apr 2001 09:35:38 -0400 From: "Eric S. Raymond" To: Alan Cox Cc: "Albert D. Cahalan" , Matthew Wilcox , james rich , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, parisc-linux@parisc-linux.org Subject: Re: [parisc-linux] Re: OK, let's try cleaning up another nit. Is anyone paying attention? Message-ID: <20010420093538.A5525@thyrsus.com> Reply-To: esr@thyrsus.com Mail-Followup-To: "Eric S. Raymond" , Alan Cox , "Albert D. Cahalan" , Matthew Wilcox , james rich , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, parisc-linux@parisc-linux.org In-Reply-To: <200104200452.f3K4q3X07411@saturn.cs.uml.edu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: ; from alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk on Fri, Apr 20, 2001 at 02:13:35PM +0100 Organization: Eric Conspiracy Secret Labs X-Eric-Conspiracy: There is no conspiracy Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Alan Cox : > I have for one. Its definitely the wrong approach to bomb Linus with patches > when doing the merge of an architecture. All the architecture folk with in > their own trees for good reason. On the other hand, Linus has objected to the One-Big-Patch approach in the past with respect to things like the networking and VM code. How are people to know what the right thing is? -- Eric S. Raymond Love your country, but never trust its government. -- Robert A. Heinlein. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/