Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S269416AbUJLBNf (ORCPT ); Mon, 11 Oct 2004 21:13:35 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S266888AbUJLBK5 (ORCPT ); Mon, 11 Oct 2004 21:10:57 -0400 Received: from smtp001.mail.ukl.yahoo.com ([217.12.11.32]:42592 "HELO smtp001.mail.ukl.yahoo.com") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S269404AbUJLBFF (ORCPT ); Mon, 11 Oct 2004 21:05:05 -0400 From: BlaisorBlade To: akpm@osdl.org Subject: [patch 0/17] UML updates, which must be merged before 2.6.9 Date: Tue, 12 Oct 2004 03:05:24 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.6.1 Cc: jdike@addtoit.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200410120305.24675.blaisorblade_spam@yahoo.it> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1569 Lines: 33 Andrew, sorry for sending these patches so late, but they are (mostly one-liners) needed to fix either warnings in compilation (the patches are safe) or probable bugs which are created by these warnings. The Makefile patch are of another kind: actually, when I send that couple of patches merged before -rc3, they were against my tree and absolutely incorrect against Linus tree; sorry for not checking that; in fact UML does not link with neither -rc3 nor -rc4 (also due to a compilation bug I already fixed for -rc3). However, this Makefile fixes fix everything, have been longly tested in public (hanging both in my tree, in SuSE UML tree and in Jeff Dike's tree). Finally, I'm sending a patch for a network corruption which is very nasty; it's a one-liner, a resync against the copied original code and I've actually tested it works perfectly. So, please, even if now we are in a hurry after -rc4, merge them. It's the only possibility for UML to actually work "out of the box". Oh well, and sorry for sending "[uml-devel] [patch 4/6] uml: don't declare cpu_online - fix compilation error" - I just noticed it's included in 2.6.9-rc4-mm1. All the rest applies without even any offsets to that tree, too. Thanks a lot for your help. -- Paolo Giarrusso, aka Blaisorblade Linux registered user n. 292729 - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/