Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Fri, 20 Apr 2001 09:57:11 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Fri, 20 Apr 2001 09:56:57 -0400 Received: from router-100M.swansea.linux.org.uk ([194.168.151.17]:27397 "EHLO the-village.bc.nu") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Fri, 20 Apr 2001 09:56:40 -0400 Subject: Re: [parisc-linux] Re: OK, let's try cleaning up another nit. Is anyone paying attention? To: esr@thyrsus.com Date: Fri, 20 Apr 2001 14:43:49 +0100 (BST) Cc: alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk (Alan Cox), acahalan@cs.uml.edu (Albert D. Cahalan), willy@ldl.fc.hp.com (Matthew Wilcox), james.rich@m.cc.utah.edu (james rich), linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, parisc-linux@parisc-linux.org In-Reply-To: <20010420093538.A5525@thyrsus.com> from "Eric S. Raymond" at Apr 20, 2001 09:35:38 AM X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.5 PL1] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: From: Alan Cox Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > Alan Cox : > > I have for one. Its definitely the wrong approach to bomb Linus with patches > > when doing the merge of an architecture. All the architecture folk with in > > their own trees for good reason. > > On the other hand, Linus has objected to the One-Big-Patch approach in > the past with respect to things like the networking and VM code. How > are people to know what the right thing is? Who said anything about one big patch ? Just because you have a lot of differences doesnt mean you send Linus one giant splat of code. I don't send Linus -ac for example. Alan - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/