Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S265910AbUJLPww (ORCPT ); Tue, 12 Oct 2004 11:52:52 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S265970AbUJLPwv (ORCPT ); Tue, 12 Oct 2004 11:52:51 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([66.187.233.31]:54967 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S265910AbUJLPwn (ORCPT ); Tue, 12 Oct 2004 11:52:43 -0400 Date: Tue, 12 Oct 2004 11:52:38 -0400 (EDT) From: Rik van Riel X-X-Sender: riel@chimarrao.boston.redhat.com To: Christoph Lameter cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, , Subject: Re: NUMA: Patch for node based swapping In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 879 Lines: 22 On Tue, 12 Oct 2004, Christoph Lameter wrote: > Any other suggestions? Since this is meant as a stop gap patch, waiting for a real solution, and is only relevant for big (and rare) systems, it would be an idea to at least leave it off by default. I think it would be safe to assume that a $100k system has a system administrator looking after it, while a $5k AMD64 whitebox might not have somebody watching its performance. -- "Debugging is twice as hard as writing the code in the first place. Therefore, if you write the code as cleverly as possible, you are, by definition, not smart enough to debug it." - Brian W. Kernighan - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/