Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S267734AbUJLUUk (ORCPT ); Tue, 12 Oct 2004 16:20:40 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S267737AbUJLUUk (ORCPT ); Tue, 12 Oct 2004 16:20:40 -0400 Received: from omx3-ext.sgi.com ([192.48.171.20]:52173 "EHLO omx3.sgi.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S267734AbUJLUUi (ORCPT ); Tue, 12 Oct 2004 16:20:38 -0400 Date: Tue, 12 Oct 2004 13:20:27 -0700 (PDT) From: Christoph Lameter X-X-Sender: clameter@schroedinger.engr.sgi.com To: Rik van Riel cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au, linux-mm@kvack.org Subject: Re: NUMA: Patch for node based swapping In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 793 Lines: 20 On Tue, 12 Oct 2004, Rik van Riel wrote: > On Tue, 12 Oct 2004, Christoph Lameter wrote: > > > Any other suggestions? > > Since this is meant as a stop gap patch, waiting for a real > solution, and is only relevant for big (and rare) systems, > it would be an idea to at least leave it off by default. > > I think it would be safe to assume that a $100k system has > a system administrator looking after it, while a $5k AMD64 > whitebox might not have somebody watching its performance. Ok. Will do that then. Should I submit the patch to Andrew? - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/