Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S267841AbUJLVX5 (ORCPT ); Tue, 12 Oct 2004 17:23:57 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S267850AbUJLVX5 (ORCPT ); Tue, 12 Oct 2004 17:23:57 -0400 Received: from e35.co.us.ibm.com ([32.97.110.133]:25570 "EHLO e35.co.us.ibm.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S267841AbUJLVXp (ORCPT ); Tue, 12 Oct 2004 17:23:45 -0400 Subject: Re: [ckrm-tech] Re: [Lse-tech] [PATCH] cpusets - big numa cpu and memory placement From: Matthew Dobson Reply-To: colpatch@us.ibm.com To: Paul Jackson Cc: Rick Lindsley , "Martin J. Bligh" , Simon.Derr@bull.net, pwil3058@bigpond.net.au, frankeh@watson.ibm.com, dipankar@in.ibm.com, Andrew Morton , ckrm-tech@lists.sourceforge.net, efocht@hpce.nec.com, LSE Tech , hch@infradead.org, steiner@sgi.com, Jesse Barnes , sylvain.jeaugey@bull.net, djh@sgi.com, LKML , Andi Kleen , sivanich@sgi.com In-Reply-To: <20041011155831.3e8d6b2f.pj@sgi.com> References: <20041007072842.2bafc320.pj@sgi.com> <200410071905.i97J57TS014336@owlet.beaverton.ibm.com> <20041009191556.06e09c67.pj@sgi.com> <1097532415.4038.50.camel@arrakis> <20041011155831.3e8d6b2f.pj@sgi.com> Content-Type: text/plain Organization: IBM LTC Message-Id: <1097616152.6239.4.camel@arrakis> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.5 (1.4.5-7) Date: Tue, 12 Oct 2004 14:22:33 -0700 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1466 Lines: 34 On Mon, 2004-10-11 at 15:58, Paul Jackson wrote: > Matthew wrote: > > One of the cool thing about using sched_domains as your partitioning > > element is that in reality, tasks run on *CPUs*, not *domains*. > > Unfortunately, my manager has reminded me of an essential deliverable > that I have for another project, due in two weeks. I'm going to need > every one of those days. So I will have to take a two week sabbatical > from this design work. > > It might make sense to reconvene this work on a new thread, with a last > message on this monster thread inviting all interested parties to come > on over. I suspect a few folks will be happy to see this thread wind > down. > > I'd guess lse-tech (my preference) or ckrm-tech would be a suitable > forum for this new thread. > > Carry on. Sounds good, Paul. I think the discussion on this thread was kind of winding down anyway. In two weeks I'll have some more work done on my code, particularly trying to get the cpusets/CKRM filesystem interface to play with my sched_domains code. We'll be able to digest all the the information, requirements, requests, etc. on this thread and start a fresh discussion on (or at least closer to) the same page. -Matt - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/