Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner+willy=40w.ods.org-S268231AbUJMCC3@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S268231AbUJMCC3 (ORCPT <rfc822;willy@w.ods.org>);
	Tue, 12 Oct 2004 22:02:29 -0400
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S268234AbUJMCC3
	(ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel-outgoing>);
	Tue, 12 Oct 2004 22:02:29 -0400
Received: from relay.pair.com ([209.68.1.20]:38925 "HELO relay.pair.com")
	by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S268231AbUJMCC1 (ORCPT
	<rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Tue, 12 Oct 2004 22:02:27 -0400
X-pair-Authenticated: 66.190.53.4
Message-ID: <416C8C98.60604@cybsft.com>
Date: Tue, 12 Oct 2004 21:02:00 -0500
From: "K.R. Foley" <kr@cybsft.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.8 (X11/20040913)
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "Bill Huey (hui)" <bhuey@lnxw.com>
CC: Sven Dietrich <sdietrich@mvista.com>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
       dwalker@mvista.com, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
       Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>, amakarov@ru.mvista.com,
       ext-rt-dev@mvista.com, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [Ext-rt-dev] Re: [ANNOUNCE] Linux 2.6 Real Time Kernel
References: <20041012211201.GA28590@nietzsche.lynx.com> <EOEGJOIIAIGENMKBPIAEGEJGDKAA.sdietrich@mvista.com> <20041012225706.GC30966@nietzsche.lynx.com>
In-Reply-To: <20041012225706.GC30966@nietzsche.lynx.com>
X-Enigmail-Version: 0.86.1.0
X-Enigmail-Supports: pgp-inline, pgp-mime
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 1337
Lines: 38

Bill Huey (hui) wrote:
<snip>
> 
> Well, uh, at least you're single kernel image folks like
> us and not flaming us/me yet for corrupting the sancity
> of Linux. Oh man, I feel a flame war coming. This is such
> touchy material.
> 
> What's Monta Vista's attitude toward preemption development ?
> open or closed ? I know this is a charged question, but
> this has to be asked. :)
> 
> This commerical thing is going to be weird. I wish I was
> an angry hippie instead of having a job at certain moments. :)

Aside from being able to claim first to market, what is to be gained by 
having this effort closed? If it is truly integrated into the Linux 
kernel and not another segregated/multi-kernel solution, is there any 
way to keep it closed?

> 
> But the bay area is pretty damn cool, so... that makes up
> for it. :)
> 
> bill
> 
> -
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/
> 

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/