Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Fri, 20 Apr 2001 13:44:05 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Fri, 20 Apr 2001 13:43:55 -0400 Received: from [63.95.87.168] ([63.95.87.168]:25100 "HELO xi.linuxpower.cx") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id ; Fri, 20 Apr 2001 13:43:38 -0400 Date: Fri, 20 Apr 2001 13:43:37 -0400 From: Gregory Maxwell To: "Carlos Parada (EST)" Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, 6bone@ISI.EDU Subject: Re: IPv6 routing Message-ID: <20010420134337.E13249@xi.linuxpower.cx> In-Reply-To: <25CCC6566D01D411885B00A024559FB701486CC3@EXCHANGE_GERAL> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.8i In-Reply-To: <25CCC6566D01D411885B00A024559FB701486CC3@EXCHANGE_GERAL>; from est-c-parada@ptinovacao.pt on Fri, Apr 20, 2001 at 06:37:05PM +0100 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Apr 20, 2001 at 06:37:05PM +0100, Carlos Parada (EST) wrote: > Hi, > > I'm trying to set up an IPv6 network in Linux kernel 2.4.0-test10. In this > network I'm using just 3 boxs and I would use static routes. > _____ _____ _____ > | A |____| B | ____| C | > |_____| |_____| |_____| > > The problem is that I cannot access from A to C machines and vice-versa. But > the routing problem is a bit strange because, A can access to the two > interfaces of B, even to B interface in the same network as C. Also C can echo -n 1 > /proc/sys/net/ipv6/conf/all/forwarding - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/