Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S269814AbUJMU1K (ORCPT ); Wed, 13 Oct 2004 16:27:10 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S269818AbUJMU1K (ORCPT ); Wed, 13 Oct 2004 16:27:10 -0400 Received: from quechua.inka.de ([193.197.184.2]:10702 "EHLO mail.inka.de") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S269814AbUJMU1H (ORCPT ); Wed, 13 Oct 2004 16:27:07 -0400 Date: Wed, 13 Oct 2004 22:27:05 +0200 From: Bernd Eckenfels To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: Hirokazu Takata Subject: Re: [PATCH 2.6.9-rc3-mm2] [m32r] SIO driver for m32r Message-ID: <20041013202705.GA29258@lina.inka.de> References: <20041006.151912.840807084.takata.hirokazu@renesas.com> <20041012.183507.350531171.takata.hirokazu@renesas.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <20041012.183507.350531171.takata.hirokazu@renesas.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040722i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 953 Lines: 22 On Tue, Oct 12, 2004 at 06:35:07PM +0900, Hirokazu Takata wrote: > > > + do { > > > + sio_init(); > > > + } while ((*status = __sio_in(PLD_ESIO0CR)) != 3); > > Hmm.. Do you have any good idea to fix it? At least a timeout/maxretry, not sure about the context... is there a locked blocked? In that case maybe something like "if !initialized" in all actual hardware using methods? Bernd -- (OO) -- Bernd_Eckenfels@M?rscher_Strasse_8.76185Karlsruhe.de -- ( .. ) ecki@{inka.de,linux.de,debian.org} http://www.eckes.org/ o--o 1024D/E383CD7E eckes@IRCNet v:+497211603874 f:+497211606754 (O____O) When cryptography is outlawed, bayl bhgynjf jvyy unir cevinpl! - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/