Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S269839AbUJMUqG (ORCPT ); Wed, 13 Oct 2004 16:46:06 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S269840AbUJMUqF (ORCPT ); Wed, 13 Oct 2004 16:46:05 -0400 Received: from parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk ([195.92.249.252]:44208 "EHLO www.linux.org.uk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S269839AbUJMUpx (ORCPT ); Wed, 13 Oct 2004 16:45:53 -0400 Message-ID: <416D93F1.903@pobox.com> Date: Wed, 13 Oct 2004 16:45:37 -0400 From: Jeff Garzik User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.7.3) Gecko/20040922 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Brad Fitzpatrick CC: "Randy.Dunlap" , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [OOPS] 2.6.9-rc4, dual Opteron, NUMA, 8GB References: <416D8999.7080102@pobox.com> <416D8C33.9080401@osdl.org> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 906 Lines: 28 Brad Fitzpatrick wrote: > I was just about to mail and report that disabling NUMA does help: > > NUMA + mke2fs on LVM: OOPS (mailed earlier) > no NUMA + mke2fs on LVM: okay > NUMA + mke2fs on sdb1: OOPS (below) > no NUMA + mke2fs on sdb1: okay > > no NUMA + mount e2fs on LVM: okay > no NUMA + mount e2fs on sb1: okay > NUMA + mount e2fs on LVM: okay > NUMA + mount e2fs on sb1: untested, assume okay Honestly it smells like a devmapper bug, with the pertinent test case being some sort of behavior not normally generated by filesystem use (the most common use case for block devices). But I could be wrong... Jeff - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/