Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S269841AbUJMUtz (ORCPT ); Wed, 13 Oct 2004 16:49:55 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S269843AbUJMUtx (ORCPT ); Wed, 13 Oct 2004 16:49:53 -0400 Received: from danga.com ([66.150.15.140]:19335 "EHLO danga.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S269841AbUJMUtI (ORCPT ); Wed, 13 Oct 2004 16:49:08 -0400 Date: Wed, 13 Oct 2004 13:49:08 -0700 (PDT) From: Brad Fitzpatrick X-X-Sender: bradfitz@danga.com To: Jeff Garzik Cc: "Randy.Dunlap" , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [OOPS] 2.6.9-rc4, dual Opteron, NUMA, 8GB In-Reply-To: <416D93F1.903@pobox.com> Message-ID: References: <416D8999.7080102@pobox.com> <416D8C33.9080401@osdl.org> <416D93F1.903@pobox.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1076 Lines: 32 On Wed, 13 Oct 2004, Jeff Garzik wrote: > Brad Fitzpatrick wrote: > > I was just about to mail and report that disabling NUMA does help: > > > > NUMA + mke2fs on LVM: OOPS (mailed earlier) > > no NUMA + mke2fs on LVM: okay > > NUMA + mke2fs on sdb1: OOPS (below) > > no NUMA + mke2fs on sdb1: okay > > > > no NUMA + mount e2fs on LVM: okay > > no NUMA + mount e2fs on sb1: okay > > NUMA + mount e2fs on LVM: okay > > NUMA + mount e2fs on sb1: untested, assume okay > > > Honestly it smells like a devmapper bug, with the pertinent test case > being some sort of behavior not normally generated by filesystem use > (the most common use case for block devices). Except for the data point above: NUMA + mke2fs on sdb1: OOPS (below) That's with devmapper totally out of the picture. - Brad - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/