Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S266878AbUJNSkS (ORCPT ); Thu, 14 Oct 2004 14:40:18 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S266793AbUJNSaR (ORCPT ); Thu, 14 Oct 2004 14:30:17 -0400 Received: from gprs212-8.eurotel.cz ([160.218.212.8]:58242 "EHLO amd.ucw.cz") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S266870AbUJNRjY (ORCPT ); Thu, 14 Oct 2004 13:39:24 -0400 Date: Thu, 14 Oct 2004 19:39:08 +0200 From: Pavel Machek To: Jeff Moyer Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mingo@redhat.com, sct@redhat.com Subject: Re: [patch rfc] towards supporting O_NONBLOCK on regular files Message-ID: <20041014173908.GC3786@elf.ucw.cz> References: <16733.50382.569265.183099@segfault.boston.redhat.com> <20041003194831.GB3089@openzaurus.ucw.cz> <16749.15265.475571.767534@segfault.boston.redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <16749.15265.475571.767534@segfault.boston.redhat.com> X-Warning: Reading this can be dangerous to your mental health. User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040907i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 628 Lines: 18 Hi! > pavel> Does it have comparable performance to aio? > > I haven't run any tests. One advantage this has to current aio is that it > can operate without O_DIRECT. Well, second advantage is that it is much nicer interface... Pavel -- People were complaining that M$ turns users into beta-testers... ...jr ghea gurz vagb qrirybcref, naq gurl frrz gb yvxr vg gung jnl! - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/