Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S267263AbUJOAGV (ORCPT ); Thu, 14 Oct 2004 20:06:21 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S268035AbUJOAC3 (ORCPT ); Thu, 14 Oct 2004 20:02:29 -0400 Received: from mail-relay-1.tiscali.it ([213.205.33.41]:34705 "EHLO mail-relay-1.tiscali.it") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S268120AbUJNX60 (ORCPT ); Thu, 14 Oct 2004 19:58:26 -0400 Date: Fri, 15 Oct 2004 01:58:45 +0200 From: Andrea Arcangeli To: Marcelo Tosatti Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Hugh Dickins , Andrew Morton Subject: Re: per-process shared information Message-ID: <20041014235845.GL17849@dualathlon.random> References: <20041013231042.GQ17849@dualathlon.random> <20041014214711.GF6899@logos.cnet> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20041014214711.GF6899@logos.cnet> X-GPG-Key: 1024D/68B9CB43 13D9 8355 295F 4823 7C49 C012 DFA1 686E 68B9 CB43 X-PGP-Key: 1024R/CB4660B9 CC A0 71 81 F4 A0 63 AC C0 4B 81 1D 8C 15 C8 E5 User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1627 Lines: 43 On Thu, Oct 14, 2004 at 06:47:11PM -0300, Marcelo Tosatti wrote: > > Hi Andrea! > > No useful comments on the statm reporting issue. > > > Ps. if somebody like Hugh volunteers implementing it, you're very > > welcome, just let me know (I'll eventually want to work on the oom > > handling too, which is pretty screwed right now, > > Yes, we've got reports of bad OOM killing behaviour (is that what you're > talking about?) > > One thing is the removal of "if (nr_swap_pages > 0) goto out" from oom_kill() > causes problems (spurious oom kill). > > We need to throttle more, on page reclaiming progress I think. > > Take a look at > > http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-mm&m=109587921204602&w=2 > > What else you're seeing? > > > I've plenty of bugs > > open on that area and the lowmem zone protection needs a rewrite too to > > be set to a sane default value no matter the pages_lows etc..). > > Nick has been working on that lately I think. What is the problem? things went worse with the switch from 2.6.8 to 2.6.9-rc, so that's not the nr_swap_pages > 0, likely the latest changes introduced regressions instead of fixing them. I'm seeing both hard deadlocks and suprious oom kills, and that all makes sense, I can see the bugs, it's just I need to fix them, my plan is to forward port some code from 2.4 which works fine, objrmap will make it even better. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/