Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Mon, 6 Nov 2000 17:06:58 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Mon, 6 Nov 2000 17:06:38 -0500 Received: from neon-gw.transmeta.com ([209.10.217.66]:28427 "EHLO neon-gw.transmeta.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Mon, 6 Nov 2000 17:06:34 -0500 To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org From: "H. Peter Anvin" Subject: Re: setup.S: A20 enable sequence (once again) Date: 6 Nov 2000 14:06:04 -0800 Organization: Transmeta Corporation, Santa Clara CA Message-ID: <8u7a0c$p4u$1@cesium.transmeta.com> In-Reply-To: <8u6vn8$70i$1@cesium.transmeta.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT Disclaimer: Not speaking for Transmeta in any way, shape, or form. Copyright: Copyright 2000 H. Peter Anvin - All Rights Reserved Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Followup to: By author: Alan Cox In newsgroup: linux.dev.kernel > > > This doesn't really work. Neither the fast A20 gate nor the KBC is > > guaranteed to have immediate effect (on most systems they won't.) > > Fast A20 gate happens to be immediate on all the embedded kit I know so its > probably acceptable, and if its too slow it still does the kbc timeout. Since > its generally on chip they dont muck about talking to keyboard and other junk > I/O controllers. > I'd rather do it "right", which is to poll for A20 in the same loop as we wait for the KBC to become available. -hpa -- at work, in private! "Unix gives you enough rope to shoot yourself in the foot." http://www.zytor.com/~hpa/puzzle.txt - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/