Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Fri, 20 Apr 2001 17:09:09 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Fri, 20 Apr 2001 17:08:59 -0400 Received: from chromium11.wia.com ([207.66.214.139]:54285 "EHLO neptune.kirkland.local") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Fri, 20 Apr 2001 17:08:48 -0400 Message-ID: <3AE0A646.74079E95@chromium.com> Date: Fri, 20 Apr 2001 14:12:38 -0700 From: Fabio Riccardi X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.77 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.4.2 i686) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Alan Cox CC: mingo@elte.hu, Zach Brown , Linux Kernel List , "David S. Miller" Subject: Re: numbers? In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Alan, SPEC connections are cumulative of static (70%) and dynamic (30%) pages, with the dynamic using quite a bit of CPU (25%-30%) and the static pages dataset of several (6-8) gigabytes. The chromium server is actually much faster than thttpd and it is a complete web server. - Fabio Alan Cox wrote: > > Incidentally the same server running on a kernel with a multiqueue scheduler > > achieves 1600 connections per second on the same machine, that was the original > > reason for my message for a better scheduler. > > I get 2000 connections a second with a single threaded server called thttpd > on my setup. Thats out of the box on 2.4.2ac with zero copy/sendfile. > > I've never had occasion to frob with tux or specweb - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/