Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Fri, 20 Apr 2001 17:41:03 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Fri, 20 Apr 2001 17:40:54 -0400 Received: from t2.redhat.com ([199.183.24.243]:61680 "EHLO passion.cambridge.redhat.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Fri, 20 Apr 2001 17:40:47 -0400 X-Mailer: exmh version 2.3 01/15/2001 with nmh-1.0.4 From: David Woodhouse X-Accept-Language: en_GB In-Reply-To: <20010420173514.A21392@thyrsus.com> In-Reply-To: <20010420173514.A21392@thyrsus.com> <20010420172435.A21252@thyrsus.com> <6817.987801548@redhat.com> <20010420172435.A21252@thyrsus.com> <7043.987802140@redhat.com> To: esr@thyrsus.com Cc: Nicolas Pitre , Tom Rini , Alan Cox , "Albert D. Cahalan" , Matthew Wilcox , james rich , lkml , parisc-linux@parisc-linux.org Subject: Re: [parisc-linux] Re: OK, let's try cleaning up another nit. Is anyone paying attention? Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Fri, 20 Apr 2001 22:39:24 +0100 Message-ID: <7261.987802764@redhat.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org esr@thyrsus.com said: > Even supposing that's so, a 36% rate of broken symbols is way too > high. It argues that we need to do a thorough housecleaning at least > once in order to get back to an acceptably low stable rate. Accepted. Can we let the 2.4 "angry penguin"-enforced stabilising period finish, and give the arch and subsystem maintainers a chance to finally brave the wrath of Linus and submit their patches, before we attempt do to it though? -- dwmw2 - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/