Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Fri, 20 Apr 2001 19:42:25 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Fri, 20 Apr 2001 19:42:16 -0400 Received: from m125-mp1-cvx1b.col.ntl.com ([213.104.72.125]:48002 "EHLO [213.104.72.125]") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Fri, 20 Apr 2001 19:42:05 -0400 To: Pavel Machek Cc: "Acpi-PM (E-mail)" , Subject: Re: Let init know user wants to shutdown In-Reply-To: <20010420190128.A905@bug.ucw.cz> From: John Fremlin Date: 21 Apr 2001 00:41:54 +0100 In-Reply-To: <20010420190128.A905@bug.ucw.cz> Message-ID: Lines: 22 User-Agent: Gnus/5.0808 (Gnus v5.8.8) XEmacs/21.4 (Solid Vapor) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Pavel Machek writes: [...] > > I'm wondering if that veto business is really needed. Why not reject > > *all* APM rejectable events, and then let the userspace event handler > > send the system to sleep or turn it off? Anybody au fait with the APM > > spec? > > My thinkpad actually started blinking with some LED when you pressed > the button. LED went off when you rejected or when sleep was > completed. Does the led start blinking when the system sends an apm suspend? In that case I don't think you'd notice the brief period between the REJECT and the following suspend from userspace ;-) [...] -- http://www.penguinpowered.com/~vii - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/