Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S269340AbUJQXUW (ORCPT ); Sun, 17 Oct 2004 19:20:22 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S269333AbUJQXRp (ORCPT ); Sun, 17 Oct 2004 19:17:45 -0400 Received: from rwcrmhc13.comcast.net ([204.127.198.39]:15264 "EHLO rwcrmhc13.comcast.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S269335AbUJQXPw (ORCPT ); Sun, 17 Oct 2004 19:15:52 -0400 Subject: Re: [patch] exec-shield-nx-2.6.9-A1 From: Albert Cahalan To: Ingo Molnar Cc: linux-kernel mailing list In-Reply-To: <20041017203055.GA10403@elte.hu> References: <1098043886.2674.14320.camel@cube> <20041017203055.GA10403@elte.hu> Content-Type: text/plain Organization: Message-Id: <1098054529.2666.14326.camel@cube> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.2.4 Date: 17 Oct 2004 19:08:50 -0400 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 783 Lines: 24 On Sun, 2004-10-17 at 16:30, Ingo Molnar wrote: > > [...] One might guess from CAP_SYS_NICE that the feature has now > > become hopelessly slow. [...] > > (thank you for the kind words, it is always heartening to read your > mails! I too wish you good luck with your projects.) :-) Well, CAP_SYS_NICE does kind of imply that there is an issue with CPU time, doesn't it? I didn't see any code that would change performance, so I suppose you figure that wchan is already too slow? CAP_SYS_ADMIN is the misc. dumping ground normally. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/