Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S268097AbUJSJLg (ORCPT ); Tue, 19 Oct 2004 05:11:36 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S268092AbUJSJLg (ORCPT ); Tue, 19 Oct 2004 05:11:36 -0400 Received: from 213-239-205-147.clients.your-server.de ([213.239.205.147]:63137 "EHLO debian.tglx.de") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S268097AbUJSJLd (ORCPT ); Tue, 19 Oct 2004 05:11:33 -0400 Subject: Re: [patch] Real-Time Preemption, -RT-2.6.9-rc4-mm1-U5 From: Thomas Gleixner Reply-To: tglx@linutronix.de To: Ingo Molnar Cc: LKML In-Reply-To: <20041019090428.GA17204@elte.hu> References: <20041012123318.GA2102@elte.hu> <20041012195424.GA3961@elte.hu> <20041013061518.GA1083@elte.hu> <20041014002433.GA19399@elte.hu> <20041014143131.GA20258@elte.hu> <20041014234202.GA26207@elte.hu> <20041015102633.GA20132@elte.hu> <20041016153344.GA16766@elte.hu> <20041018145008.GA25707@elte.hu> <1098173546.12223.737.camel@thomas> <20041019090428.GA17204@elte.hu> Content-Type: text/plain Organization: linutronix Message-Id: <1098176615.12223.753.camel@thomas> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.6 Date: Tue, 19 Oct 2004 11:03:35 +0200 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 645 Lines: 18 On Tue, 2004-10-19 at 11:04, Ingo Molnar wrote: > > All sleep_on variants trigger the irqs_disabled() check in schedule(). > > tglx > > ah, forgot that the waitqueue lock is a raw lock. Is there _any_ > scenario where sleep_on() is actually correct kernel code? Hmm, the sleep_on() variants are used quite a lot over the kernel. Whats wrong with them and to what should they be converted ? tglx - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/