Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S266611AbUJTHnB (ORCPT ); Wed, 20 Oct 2004 03:43:01 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S270035AbUJTHh0 (ORCPT ); Wed, 20 Oct 2004 03:37:26 -0400 Received: from rproxy.gmail.com ([64.233.170.195]:2918 "EHLO mproxy.gmail.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S266611AbUJTHfi (ORCPT ); Wed, 20 Oct 2004 03:35:38 -0400 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:references; b=R65IHscj1cHmVaW8+h560jiOhHSc5piv7GtcKjD030p2kKahmvw4Zawj7sUadKnfe9TWzRDgQaFCIC0x+9riOgsvJRa5/DPw502ruY/zoYl5pKpki5yYFBJ15LGh/PpqHHf3o3kvHKlizsUK3dLuwMZdhbI5X8mctrtNUIzjMGs Message-ID: <4d8e3fd304102000355be4a2ef@mail.gmail.com> Date: Wed, 20 Oct 2004 09:35:37 +0200 From: Paolo Ciarrocchi Reply-To: Paolo Ciarrocchi To: Linus Torvalds Subject: Re: BK kernel workflow Cc: Jeff Garzik , Linux Kernel , Larry McVoy , akpm@osdl.org In-Reply-To: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit References: <41752E53.8060103@pobox.com> <20041019153126.GG18939@work.bitmover.com> <41753B99.5090003@pobox.com> <4d8e3fd304101914332979f86a@mail.gmail.com> <20041019213803.GA6994@havoc.gtf.org> <4d8e3fd3041019145469f03527@mail.gmail.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1028 Lines: 29 On Tue, 19 Oct 2004 15:11:55 -0700 (PDT), Linus Torvalds wrote: > > > On Tue, 19 Oct 2004, Paolo Ciarrocchi wrote: > > > > I know I'm pedantic but can we all see the list of bk trees ("patches > > ready for mainstream" and "patches eventually ready for mainstream") > > that we'll be used by Linus ? > > Even _I_ don't have that kind of list. > > It's on a case-by-case basis (although with certain developers, the cases > tend to be pretty clear-cut), and it literally changes over time. Some > people use throw-away trees that are just used for some particular set, > and I merge them (or not), and they go away. So ATM is not possible to "formalize" the process (and probably even not necessary) Thank you. -- Paolo Personal home page: www.ciarrocchi.tk - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/