Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S270181AbUJTJnP (ORCPT ); Wed, 20 Oct 2004 05:43:15 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S270276AbUJTJiK (ORCPT ); Wed, 20 Oct 2004 05:38:10 -0400 Received: from pimout3-ext.prodigy.net ([207.115.63.102]:41192 "EHLO pimout3-ext.prodigy.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S270057AbUJTJcl (ORCPT ); Wed, 20 Oct 2004 05:32:41 -0400 Date: Wed, 20 Oct 2004 02:31:40 -0700 From: Chris Wedgwood To: Ingo Molnar Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt , Paul Mackerras , Andrew Morton , Linus Torvalds , Anton Blanchard , Linux Kernel list , Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: New consolidate irqs vs . probe_irq_*() Message-ID: <20041020093140.GA27119@taniwha.stupidest.org> References: <16758.3807.954319.110353@cargo.ozlabs.ibm.com> <20041020083358.GB23396@elte.hu> <1098261745.6263.9.camel@gaston> <20041020084838.GA25798@elte.hu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20041020084838.GA25798@elte.hu> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 616 Lines: 14 On Wed, Oct 20, 2004 at 10:48:38AM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote: > yeah. I've put it into a separate autoprobe.c file specifically for > that reason, you can exclude it in the Makefile and can provide your > own architecture version. Or should we make the no-autoprobing > choice generic perhaps? UML could also use that since it doesn't need autoprobe.c strictly speaking. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/