Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S270360AbUJTNlg (ORCPT ); Wed, 20 Oct 2004 09:41:36 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S270126AbUJTM47 (ORCPT ); Wed, 20 Oct 2004 08:56:59 -0400 Received: from i31207.upc-i.chello.nl ([62.195.31.207]:27271 "EHLO laptop.fenrus.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S270316AbUJTMwb (ORCPT ); Wed, 20 Oct 2004 08:52:31 -0400 Subject: Re: [PATCH] implement in-kernel keys & keyring management From: Arjan van de Ven To: Linux Kernel Mailing List Cc: torvalds@osdl.org In-Reply-To: <200410191615.i9JGF8IW002712@hera.kernel.org> References: <200410191615.i9JGF8IW002712@hera.kernel.org> Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <1098276738.2803.18.camel@laptop.fenrus.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.6 (1.4.6-2) Date: Wed, 20 Oct 2004 08:52:19 -0400 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 691 Lines: 13 On Tue, 2004-10-19 at 10:58, Linux Kernel Mailing List wrote: > ChangeSet 1.2260, 2004/10/19 07:58:51-07:00, dhowells@redhat.com I thought there was a goal to not add multiplexer syscalls anymore, especially not without thinking about 32/64 bit emulation first... sounds like it's best to back out this changeset until that bit is resolved (I thought the agreement was that this one was stuck in -mm until this got sorted out in the first place) - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/