Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S268166AbUJTPqs (ORCPT ); Wed, 20 Oct 2004 11:46:48 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S268421AbUJTPpJ (ORCPT ); Wed, 20 Oct 2004 11:45:09 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([66.187.233.31]:46808 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S268166AbUJTPgE (ORCPT ); Wed, 20 Oct 2004 11:36:04 -0400 Date: Wed, 20 Oct 2004 17:35:11 +0200 From: Arjan van de Ven To: Timothy Miller Cc: Hugh Dickins , "Martin J. Bligh" , Andrea Arcangeli , Alan Cox , Chris Wedgwood , LKML , Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] Separate IRQ-stacks from 4K-stacks option Message-ID: <20041020153510.GA21556@devserv.devel.redhat.com> References: <417687BE.5020900@techsource.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <417687BE.5020900@techsource.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 504 Lines: 11 > > Given the finite and small number of IRQ stacks required, I see no > reason not to make them 8K, other than for elegance sake. You're not > really wasting much memory by giving IRQ's 8k stacks. really sucky though; look at how current is implemented. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/