Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sat, 21 Apr 2001 15:38:18 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sat, 21 Apr 2001 15:38:08 -0400 Received: from ns.suse.de ([213.95.15.193]:31236 "HELO Cantor.suse.de") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id ; Sat, 21 Apr 2001 15:38:03 -0400 Date: Sat, 21 Apr 2001 21:37:51 +0200 From: Andi Kleen To: Peter Makholm Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Idea: Encryption plugin architecture for file-systems Message-ID: <20010421213751.A13395@gruyere.muc.suse.de> In-Reply-To: <8766fyt5x3.fsf@xyzzy.adsl.dk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <8766fyt5x3.fsf@xyzzy.adsl.dk>; from peter@makholm.net on Sat, Apr 21, 2001 at 09:21:44PM +0200 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sat, Apr 21, 2001 at 09:21:44PM +0200, Peter Makholm wrote: > nagytam@rerecognition.com ("Tamas Nagy") writes: > > > Idea: > > extend the current file-system with an optional plug-in system, which allows > > for file-system level encryption instead of file-level. > > That's is one of the things the loop device offers. For better > encryption than XOR you need the patches from kerneli.org. No, you don't. The standard kernel loop device supports loading of external crypto filters just fine; no patching at all required. -Andi - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/