Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S270519AbUJTXnJ (ORCPT ); Wed, 20 Oct 2004 19:43:09 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S270335AbUJTXab (ORCPT ); Wed, 20 Oct 2004 19:30:31 -0400 Received: from rproxy.gmail.com ([64.233.170.196]:49523 "EHLO mproxy.gmail.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S270557AbUJTXQL (ORCPT ); Wed, 20 Oct 2004 19:16:11 -0400 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=lGz1CFzlZUqSa0jKIRN95ZbPm451GyZzMWuKzAhxxGIE3lEqdF5uiEC5D6FcMsP3iaB6X93nYMFO6QyVFfKAcUQN9TTnLb3oywDn5hi0q2zOtfRRbKwkOtNs5LqPILukpug/aF60Wr+wFC3TgA28/jCv2g2d2KRCouGB7WIX9UE Message-ID: Date: Wed, 20 Oct 2004 11:16:05 -1200 From: Adam Hunt Reply-To: Adam Hunt To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: I/O scheduler recomendation for Linux as a VMware guest Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1439 Lines: 29 I am forced to spend quite a bit of time with my only relatively powerful workstation booted into XP so I can do CAD work (unfortunately Autodesk's Inventor only runs on Windows). Because of this unfortunate situation I am planning my first attempt to get the Linux install that I have on the other drive in this workstation to boot using VMware. VMware has the ability to access raw disk partitions (as apposed to partitions stored in a file on a host partition) so I figure with some init and /etc magic I should be able to boot the system using VMware and when I am not drawing in Inventor I should be able to reboot and run Linux natively directly on the hardware. What I am wondering is what I/O scheduler should I be using when the system is running within a VMware instance? I figure that Windows will be scheduling the access to the physical hardware so I would assume that I want a bare bones priority based scheduler, something with the lowest possible overhead. Is this correct? If so, what would that scheduler be? IIRC someone (Ingo?) was working on the ability to change schedules during runtime. How has that work progressed? Is it available in any kernel trees? --adam - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/