Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S270343AbUJTW7z (ORCPT ); Wed, 20 Oct 2004 18:59:55 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S270446AbUJTWdH (ORCPT ); Wed, 20 Oct 2004 18:33:07 -0400 Received: from ctb-mesg5.saix.net ([196.25.240.77]:64981 "EHLO ctb-mesg5.saix.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S270574AbUJTWT3 (ORCPT ); Wed, 20 Oct 2004 18:19:29 -0400 Subject: Re: HARDWARE: Open-Source-Friendly Graphics Cards -- Viable? [u] From: "Martin Schlemmer [c]" Reply-To: Martin Schlemmer To: Timothy Miller Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List In-Reply-To: <4176E08B.2050706@techsource.com> References: <4176E08B.2050706@techsource.com> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-jn+1vmnnIkOkILZIXu07" Date: Thu, 21 Oct 2004 00:19:07 +0200 Message-Id: <1098310747.15115.64.camel@nosferatu.lan> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.0.2 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 2650 Lines: 79 --=-jn+1vmnnIkOkILZIXu07 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, 2004-10-20 at 18:02 -0400, Timothy Miller wrote: Hi, > So, here are some questions to answer: >=20 > (1) Would the sales volumes of this product be enough to make it worth=20 > producing (ie. profitable)? No idea - I for one would think that most gamer Linux users will buy it if its got the performance 3D wise - many others that only want 2D, or at least accelerated render support in X, as well as XV, etc. > (2) How much would you be willing to pay for it? I am not that a big a gamer, so my Geforce 5700 ultra is fine for my needs. If the card have relative performance to that, and drivers is the same quality as nvidia's (but hopefully better, and really not ati's crappy standard), then I would fork the same amount as you would for an 5700, or slightly more if not that much. Not sure what that amounts to. > (3) How do you feel about the choice of neglecting 3D performance as a=20 > priority? How important is 3D performance? In what cases is it not? Yeah, I think it is important - just for decent performance in gnome/kde, you need a card with accel RENDER support, as well as XV/GL for video. Not to talk about those of us that are heavy gamers, or like me who like my ut2004/quake3/nvn once or twice a week. > (4) How much extra would you be willing to pay for excellent 3D performan= ce? Well, above price was for performance on par or just below a 5700. I know it will be more expensive to develop, so if it was a bit more expensive than the same class nvidia/ati, but with better drivers, I would be sold. The reality of the issue is just while I love my linux, I rather taint my kernel than crappy X performance or no gaming now and then. > (5) What's most important to you, performance, price, or stability? >=20 Performance and stability, but it being 3 times more expensive than on par nvidia/ati cards wont cut it. Hope that is not too vague to help a bit. Regards, --=20 Martin Schlemmer --=-jn+1vmnnIkOkILZIXu07 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBBduRbqburzKaJYLYRAkSNAJwO9uXygPUniNKU+CAq6vLK5UHn6ACfQtPL mgDRtIVUXHOnwlUX5aghERM= =Clc2 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-jn+1vmnnIkOkILZIXu07-- - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/