Message-ID: <4176E671.4090104@verizon.net>
Date: Wed, 20 Oct 2004 18:28:01 -0400
From: Jim Nelson <james4765@verizon.net>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.7.3) Gecko/20040922
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Timothy Miller <miller@techsource.com>
CC: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: HARDWARE: Open-Source-Friendly Graphics Cards -- Viable?
References: <4176E08B.2050706@techsource.com>
In-Reply-To: <4176E08B.2050706@techsource.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 2635
Lines: 54

Timothy Miller wrote:

> I can produce more detail later, but first, some characteristics and 
> advantages of what I'm proposing:
> 
> - x86 BIOS/OpenBoot/OpenFirmware code under BSD and GPL license
> - kernel drivers under BSD and GPL license
> - X11 module under MIT license
> - flashable PROM so that boot code can be added for more platforms
> - usable as the console on any platform that can take a PCI, AGP, or 
> PCI-Express card
> - downloadable schematic for the circuit board
> - FPGA-based graphics engine so it's reprogrammable
> - instructions on how to reprogram the FPGA, so it's hackable
> - if we discontinue a product, we may release the Verilog code for the FPGA
> - Since this is designed to be open-source-friendly, we want to play by 
> the rules of the open-source community.
> - Tech Source would actively participate in the development and 
> maintenance of our own drivers.
> - We will actually pay attention to problems and concerns raised by 
> users and developers.
> - We won't be control-freaks.

> I haven't worked out a complete design spec for this product.  The 
> reason is that what we think people want and what people REALLY want may 
> not be congruent.  If you have a good idea for a piece of graphics 
> hardware which you think would be beneficial to the free software 
> community (and worth it for a company to produce), then Tech Source, as 
> a graphics company, might be willing to sell it.
> 
> 

You might want to take a look at the onboard video market.  Providing an 
open-source 2D rendering engine and the PCI glue logic that work on an 
FPGA would probably revolutionize embedded PC applicatiuons that rely on 
a graphical interface.  Providing support to motherboard manufaturers 
who might want a low-cost onboard video solution (micro-ITX, etc) is 
another possibility.

You also might want to look at PC/104 and CompactPCI form factors - I 
think the industrial market will be a great target, and, after all, if 
you have to move 80% industrial equipment to justify the 20% AGP sales, 
it makes good sense.  There might even be a market for ISA, SBus, and 
MCA cards, for people stuck supporting seriously old machines (386, 486, 
SPARC) where it's almost impossible to find working graphics cards. 
Even if it's a DOS machine, hardware is hardware, and a brand-new VL-bus 
card for someone's 486 would be pretty cool :)

My $0.02
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/