Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sat, 21 Apr 2001 17:11:24 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sat, 21 Apr 2001 17:11:14 -0400 Received: from se1.cogenit.fr ([195.68.53.173]:41998 "EHLO se1.cogenit.fr") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Sat, 21 Apr 2001 17:11:12 -0400 Date: Sat, 21 Apr 2001 23:11:06 +0200 From: Francois Romieu To: "Eric S. Raymond" , CML2 , kbuild-devel@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: Re: Request for comment -- a better attribution system Message-ID: <20010421231106.A15828@se1.cogenit.fr> In-Reply-To: <200104212023.f3LKN7P188973@saturn.cs.uml.edu> <20010421164659.A4704@thyrsus.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <20010421164659.A4704@thyrsus.com>; from esr@thyrsus.com on Sat, Apr 21, 2001 at 04:46:59PM -0400 X-Organisation: Marie's fan club - I Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Eric S. Raymond ecrit : [...] > One of the problems this `overdesign' can help solve is actually identifying > the parts that have semi-permanent maintainers, and the parts that don't. > > One way to use the meta-information, for example, would be to use it to > periodically poll maintainers to find out if they're still active. > > Another is to be able to generate reports on exactly how much of the kernel > is in "Maintained" or "Supported" status. I think it would be worth > making this change just so we could know that. Y N The kernel will perform better [ ] [ ] Somebody will have less work [ ] [ ] It's fun (TM) [ ] [ ] -- Ueimor - cd /pub - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/