Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S269080AbUJUInn (ORCPT ); Thu, 21 Oct 2004 04:43:43 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S270517AbUJUImT (ORCPT ); Thu, 21 Oct 2004 04:42:19 -0400 Received: from MailBox.iNES.RO ([80.86.96.21]:60807 "EHLO MailBox.iNES.RO") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S270405AbUJUIgZ (ORCPT ); Thu, 21 Oct 2004 04:36:25 -0400 Subject: Re: Proposal: Desktop kernel bk tree/patchset. From: Dumitru Ciobarcianu To: ncunningham@linuxmail.org Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List In-Reply-To: <1098344977.4146.21.camel@desktop.cunninghams> References: <1098344977.4146.21.camel@desktop.cunninghams> Content-Type: text/plain Organization: iNES Group Date: Thu, 21 Oct 2004 11:36:05 +0300 Message-Id: <1098347765.10212.9.camel@DustPuppy.lnx.ro> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.0.2 (2.0.2-1) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 783 Lines: 24 On Thu, 2004-10-21 at 17:49 +1000, Nigel Cunningham wrote: > I want to get some feedback. I'm considering making a tree/patchset > aimed at the desktop user: Linus kernel + PM, USB and so on patches, > Win4Lin patches and perhaps [I/O] scheduler improvements. -ck maybe ? Last time I tried it was a tiny conflict between -ck and swsusp2. > What do people think? I think taking the time to collect the patches and resolve all the conflicts will be greatly appreciated. Send me the url, I'll be bugging with bug reports :). -- Cioby - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/