Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S269020AbUJUJWd (ORCPT ); Thu, 21 Oct 2004 05:22:33 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S268971AbUJUJVe (ORCPT ); Thu, 21 Oct 2004 05:21:34 -0400 Received: from i31207.upc-i.chello.nl ([62.195.31.207]:29831 "EHLO laptop.fenrus.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S269022AbUJUJUn (ORCPT ); Thu, 21 Oct 2004 05:20:43 -0400 Subject: Re: [PATCH] Add key management syscalls to non-i386 archs From: Arjan van de Ven To: David Howells Cc: Andi Kleen , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, akpm@osdl.org In-Reply-To: <23586.1098301696@redhat.com> References: <3506.1098283455@redhat.com.suse.lists.linux.kernel> <23586.1098301696@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <1098350429.2810.19.camel@laptop.fenrus.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.6 (1.4.6-2) Date: Thu, 21 Oct 2004 11:20:29 +0200 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 836 Lines: 17 On Wed, 2004-10-20 at 21:48, David Howells wrote: > > Hey, I already allocated 248 for setaltroot. And no, you cannot > > allocate system calls on your own without going through the > > architecture maintainer. The normal workflow is that you add > > them to i386 and the other follow on their own. > > That's what I intended, but others, especially Arjan, seem to think I should > do all the compat stuff for all archs myself. eh please don't abuse my name like that. I asked for ONE compat emulation thing to show it can be done, that's not the same as asking for butchering every arch. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/