Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S269216AbUJUN6i (ORCPT ); Thu, 21 Oct 2004 09:58:38 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S268458AbUJUNsn (ORCPT ); Thu, 21 Oct 2004 09:48:43 -0400 Received: from i31207.upc-i.chello.nl ([62.195.31.207]:63117 "EHLO laptop.fenrus.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S269216AbUJUNrg (ORCPT ); Thu, 21 Oct 2004 09:47:36 -0400 Subject: Re: [patch 2.6.9 0/11] Add MODULE_VERSION to several network drivers From: Arjan van de Ven To: "John W. Linville" Cc: netdev@oss.sgi.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, jgarzik@pobox.com, davem@davemloft.net, john.ronciak@intel.com, ganesh.venkatesan@intel.com, akpm@osdl.org, romieu@fr.zoreil.com, ctindel@users.sourceforge.net, fubar@us.ibm.com, greearb@candelatech.com In-Reply-To: <20041021082205.A29340@tuxdriver.com> References: <20041020141146.C8775@tuxdriver.com> <1098350269.2810.17.camel@laptop.fenrus.com> <20041021082205.A29340@tuxdriver.com> Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <1098366370.2810.31.camel@laptop.fenrus.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.6 (1.4.6-2) Date: Thu, 21 Oct 2004 15:46:11 +0200 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1410 Lines: 31 On Thu, 2004-10-21 at 14:22, John W. Linville wrote: > > > have you checked if the version of these drivers is actually useful? (eg > > updated when the driver changes) If it's not I'd say adding a > > MODULE_VERSION to it makes no sense whatsoever. > > Why do I feel like I'm being baited...? :-) > > I would have to suspect that if a version string exists, that it has at > least some meaning to the primary developers/maintainters. It certainly > is beyond my control to force the maintainers to give meaning to their > version strings. Since the skeleton driver includes a define for that, I suspect your assumption is a bit overly optimistic. > Is this a political statement against the MODULE_VERSION macro and/or > its purpose? I'm not overly interested in debating that one... Not really. I have absolutely no problem with a MODULE_VERSION macro *IF* the version it advertises means something. However if the version it advertises has no meaning whatsoever (eg the version number never gets updated) then imo it's better to NOT advertise anything so that other tools (like dkms) don't make assumptions and decisions based on nothing-meaning data. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/