Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S270988AbUJUVcz (ORCPT ); Thu, 21 Oct 2004 17:32:55 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S270990AbUJUV3E (ORCPT ); Thu, 21 Oct 2004 17:29:04 -0400 Received: from pop5-1.us4.outblaze.com ([205.158.62.125]:23004 "HELO pop5-1.us4.outblaze.com") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S270836AbUJUV1y (ORCPT ); Thu, 21 Oct 2004 17:27:54 -0400 Subject: Re: Proposal: Desktop kernel bk tree/patchset. From: Nigel Cunningham Reply-To: ncunningham@linuxmail.org To: Nick Piggin Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List In-Reply-To: <417780CB.4060106@yahoo.com.au> References: <1098344977.4146.21.camel@desktop.cunninghams> <417780CB.4060106@yahoo.com.au> Content-Type: text/plain Message-Id: <1098393711.4146.35.camel@desktop.cunninghams> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.6-1mdk Date: Fri, 22 Oct 2004 07:21:52 +1000 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 2034 Lines: 50 Hi. On Thu, 2004-10-21 at 19:26, Nick Piggin wrote: > I don't think it would be a really good idea to have an official tree > for desktop users. A staging area for desktop improvements, sure that > would be no problem. But if you really have some good improvements, > they should eventually get into the mainline kernel where you can > expect a pretty good (or not terribly bad) review and testing process. Yeah; I'm thinking more a staging area where people who use Linux for desktop work (as I do) can bang on the PM support and other enhancements they'd be after. Not an end in itself. > On the other hand, I understand you're probably frustrated at the slow > pace and politics of getting more ambitious patches into the kernel. Actually, I'm not at all. The slowness in merging suspend2 has so far been because I've been putting lots of work into trying to get everything neater and tidier, so I only have myself to blame there :>. I'm hoping to begin another round of posting patches shortly, hopefully this time including the substance of the patches. > I'd go for angle of aiming to get things into -mm. Andrew generally > doesn't mind brewing things up there, even if there is no clear path > for merging into 2.6 at the time... so long as they're pretty stable > and not going to cause rejects all over the tree, of course. Yes, I'm aiming for -mm. Stability isn't a problem, and it touches a lot less of the tree than it used to: the main changes now are refrigerator improvements and hooks. > Just my two cents. Appreciated! Nigel -- Nigel Cunningham Pastoral Worker Christian Reformed Church of Tuggeranong PO Box 1004, Tuggeranong, ACT 2901 Everyone lives by faith. Some people just don't believe it. Want proof? Try to prove that the theory of evolution is true. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/