Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S270783AbUJUSVH (ORCPT ); Thu, 21 Oct 2004 14:21:07 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S268439AbUJUSQs (ORCPT ); Thu, 21 Oct 2004 14:16:48 -0400 Received: from pfepc.post.tele.dk ([195.41.46.237]:22558 "EHLO pfepc.post.tele.dk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S270692AbUJUSOk (ORCPT ); Thu, 21 Oct 2004 14:14:40 -0400 Date: Thu, 21 Oct 2004 22:15:45 +0200 From: Sam Ravnborg To: "Richard B. Johnson" Cc: Linux kernel Subject: Re: Module compilation Message-ID: <20041021201545.GA16474@mars.ravnborg.org> Mail-Followup-To: "Richard B. Johnson" , Linux kernel References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 829 Lines: 22 On Wed, Oct 20, 2004 at 10:36:00AM -0400, Richard B. Johnson wrote> > ...but it's not CFLAGS that needs to be modified, it's > a named variable that doesn't exist yet, perhaps "USERDEF", > or "DEFINES". Reading the above I cannot what amkes you say that EXTRA_CFLAGS or CFLAGS_module.o cannot be used? Is it the name you do not like or is it some fnctionality you are missing? >I see that the normal "defines" is a constant > called "CHECKFLAGS", so this isn't appropriate for user > modification. CHECKFLAGS is only used when you use "make C=1" - to pass options to sparse. Sam - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/