Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S269800AbUJVHds (ORCPT ); Fri, 22 Oct 2004 03:33:48 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S269760AbUJVHcs (ORCPT ); Fri, 22 Oct 2004 03:32:48 -0400 Received: from mail.dif.dk ([193.138.115.101]:30391 "EHLO mail.dif.dk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S269839AbUJSQsE (ORCPT ); Tue, 19 Oct 2004 12:48:04 -0400 Date: Tue, 19 Oct 2004 18:55:59 +0200 (CEST) From: Jesper Juhl To: ebiederm@xmission.com Cc: Linus Torvalds , Kernel Mailing List Subject: Re: Linux v2.6.9... In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1231 Lines: 32 On Tue, 18 Oct 2004 ebiederm@xmission.com wrote: > Linus Torvalds writes: > > > Ok, > > despite some naming confusion (expanation: I'm a retard), I did end up > > doing the 2.6.9 release today. And it wasn't the same as the "-final" test > > release (see explanation above). > > > > Excuses aside, not a lot of changes since -rc4 (which was the last > > announced test-kernel), mainly some UML updates that don't affect anybody > > else. And a number of one-liners or compiler fixes. Full list appended. > > The ChangeLog-2.6.9 only list changes from v2.6.9-rc4 and not 2.6.8 > > ChangeLogs that don't cover the same set of changes their corresponding > patches cover just don't seem right somehow. > I agree, that was bugging me as well. Having the full ChangeLog to the previous version in kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v2.6/ is useful, having only a partial log is less so. Could we please get the complete 2.6.8 -> 2.6.9 ChangeLog there? -- Jesper Juhl - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/