Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S270886AbUJVJM5 (ORCPT ); Fri, 22 Oct 2004 05:12:57 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S270877AbUJVJI4 (ORCPT ); Fri, 22 Oct 2004 05:08:56 -0400 Received: from smtp.Lynuxworks.com ([207.21.185.24]:33810 "EHLO smtp.lynuxworks.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S270889AbUJVJHf (ORCPT ); Fri, 22 Oct 2004 05:07:35 -0400 Date: Fri, 22 Oct 2004 02:06:37 -0700 To: Jens Axboe Cc: Bill Huey , Thomas Gleixner , Rui Nuno Capela , Ingo Molnar , LKML , Lee Revell , mark_h_johnson@raytheon.com, "K.R. Foley" , Adam Heath , Florian Schmidt , Michal Schmidt , Fernando Pablo Lopez-Lezcano Subject: Re: [patch] Real-Time Preemption, -RT-2.6.9-rc4-mm1-U8 Message-ID: <20041022090637.GA24523@nietzsche.lynx.com> References: <1098352441.26758.30.camel@thomas> <20041021101103.GC10531@suse.de> <20041021195842.GA23864@nietzsche.lynx.com> <20041021201443.GF32465@suse.de> <20041021202422.GA24555@nietzsche.lynx.com> <20041021203350.GK32465@suse.de> <20041021203821.GA24628@nietzsche.lynx.com> <20041022061901.GM32465@suse.de> <20041022085007.GA24444@nietzsche.lynx.com> <20041022085928.GK1820@suse.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20041022085928.GK1820@suse.de> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040907i From: Bill Huey (hui) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1256 Lines: 29 On Fri, Oct 22, 2004 at 10:59:28AM +0200, Jens Axboe wrote: > On Fri, Oct 22 2004, Bill Huey wrote: > > On Fri, Oct 22, 2004 at 08:19:01AM +0200, Jens Axboe wrote: > > > It has to go, why? Because your deadlock detection breaks? Doesn't seem > > > a very strong reason to me at all, sorry. > > > > The deadlock detector is needed. Whether you understand that or not is > > irrelevant to the current work that's being done. And your idiot attacks > > against it doesn't correct these issues nor does it gain credibility > > with the audience that does find it useful. > > *plonk* > > If you can't stand criticism without resorting to feeble personal > attacks, I suggest you go elsewhere. Then stick to the topic at hand, suggest positive changes, and cut the crap with implied personal attacks like the above. If you hadn't pull the discussion to that point, I wouldn't have reacted that way. It's completely juvenile behavior from you and you can't expect me or anybody else to take it sitting down. bill - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/