Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S270909AbUJVJWb (ORCPT ); Fri, 22 Oct 2004 05:22:31 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S270907AbUJVJWT (ORCPT ); Fri, 22 Oct 2004 05:22:19 -0400 Received: from ns.virtualhost.dk ([195.184.98.160]:16032 "EHLO virtualhost.dk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S270930AbUJVJV3 (ORCPT ); Fri, 22 Oct 2004 05:21:29 -0400 Date: Fri, 22 Oct 2004 11:20:59 +0200 From: Jens Axboe To: Bill Huey Cc: Thomas Gleixner , Rui Nuno Capela , Ingo Molnar , LKML , Lee Revell , mark_h_johnson@raytheon.com, "K.R. Foley" , Adam Heath , Florian Schmidt , Michal Schmidt , Fernando Pablo Lopez-Lezcano Subject: Re: [patch] Real-Time Preemption, -RT-2.6.9-rc4-mm1-U8 Message-ID: <20041022092058.GO1820@suse.de> References: <20041021195842.GA23864@nietzsche.lynx.com> <20041021201443.GF32465@suse.de> <20041021202422.GA24555@nietzsche.lynx.com> <20041021203350.GK32465@suse.de> <20041021203821.GA24628@nietzsche.lynx.com> <20041022061901.GM32465@suse.de> <20041022085007.GA24444@nietzsche.lynx.com> <20041022085928.GK1820@suse.de> <20041022090637.GA24523@nietzsche.lynx.com> <20041022090938.GB24523@nietzsche.lynx.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20041022090938.GB24523@nietzsche.lynx.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1297 Lines: 31 On Fri, Oct 22 2004, Bill Huey wrote: > On Fri, Oct 22, 2004 at 02:06:37AM -0700, Bill Huey wrote: > > On Fri, Oct 22, 2004 at 10:59:28AM +0200, Jens Axboe wrote: > > > *plonk* > > > > > > If you can't stand criticism without resorting to feeble personal > > > attacks, I suggest you go elsewhere. > > > > Then stick to the topic at hand, suggest positive changes, and cut the > > crap with implied personal attacks like the above. If you hadn't pull > > the discussion to that point, I wouldn't have reacted that way. It's > > completely juvenile behavior from you and you can't expect me or > > anybody else to take it sitting down. > > This is also email, so misunderstanding and misinterpretations do > happen. If that's the case, then I'm sorry to misunderstand you and then > get upset, but next time be more specific about improving this code and > other things related to it. I've been as clear as I know how on the matter of semaphore use in Linux. I've made no comments at all on improving your deadlock detection scheme. -- Jens Axboe - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/