Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S271231AbUJVLfl (ORCPT ); Fri, 22 Oct 2004 07:35:41 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S271221AbUJVLfk (ORCPT ); Fri, 22 Oct 2004 07:35:40 -0400 Received: from gprs213-171.eurotel.cz ([160.218.213.171]:1408 "EHLO amd.ucw.cz") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S271231AbUJVLel (ORCPT ); Fri, 22 Oct 2004 07:34:41 -0400 Date: Fri, 22 Oct 2004 12:28:29 +0200 From: Pavel Machek To: Jeff Garzik Cc: Dave Jones , Linux Kernel Subject: Re: Rate of change Message-ID: <20041022102828.GA982@elf.ucw.cz> References: <41758410.2020200@pobox.com> <20041019213758.GE22334@redhat.com> <20041019213932.GA7383@havoc.gtf.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20041019213932.GA7383@havoc.gtf.org> X-Warning: Reading this can be dangerous to your mental health. User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040907i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 847 Lines: 26 Hi! > > > 850 changesets and 3383 revisions since 2.6.9 was released, > > > a little over 24 hours ago. > > > > > > That's pretty impressive. > > > > Given a lot of these are backlogs from folks being > > conservative whilst we were in -rc, perhaps this is an > > indication we need shorter -rc periods ? > > > Actually, we need longer non-rc periods :) Or perhaps we need 2.7? It would probably make sense to keep 2.7 shorter than usual... Pavel -- People were complaining that M$ turns users into beta-testers... ...jr ghea gurz vagb qrirybcref, naq gurl frrz gb yvxr vg gung jnl! - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/