Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sun, 22 Apr 2001 06:23:11 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sun, 22 Apr 2001 06:23:02 -0400 Received: from sphinx.mythic-beasts.com ([195.82.107.246]:48390 "EHLO sphinx.mythic-beasts.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Sun, 22 Apr 2001 06:22:50 -0400 Date: Sun, 22 Apr 2001 11:22:11 +0100 (BST) From: Matthew Kirkwood To: "Eric S. Raymond" cc: Alan Cox , CML2 , Subject: Re: Request for comment -- a better attribution system In-Reply-To: <20010421194706.A14896@thyrsus.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sat, 21 Apr 2001, Eric S. Raymond wrote: > Alan, if MAINTAINERS scaled perfectly I wouldn't have had to spend > three months just trying to figure out who was reponsible for each of > the [Cc]onfig.in files. And even with that amount of effort mostly > failing. I have a much simpler proposal, which appears to solve your immediate problem, and would keep most people happy -- add a: C: CONFIG_SCSI_BLARG tag to MAINTAINERS. If you _really_ insist, add an: F: drivers/scsi/blarg.c F: drivers/scsi/blarg.h too. It removes the ambiguity inherent in the current system, without adding an overengineered solution with no obvious advantages. Matthew. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/