Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S269319AbUJWDEi (ORCPT ); Fri, 22 Oct 2004 23:04:38 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S269318AbUJWDDb (ORCPT ); Fri, 22 Oct 2004 23:03:31 -0400 Received: from h-68-165-86-241.dllatx37.covad.net ([68.165.86.241]:26180 "EHLO sol.microgate.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S269109AbUJVXVt (ORCPT ); Fri, 22 Oct 2004 19:21:49 -0400 Subject: Re: My thoughts on the "new development model" From: Paul Fulghum To: Lee Revell Cc: Espen =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Fjellv=E6r?= Olsen , Linux Kernel list In-Reply-To: <1098485905.1440.11.camel@krustophenia.net> References: <7aaed09104102213032c0d7415@mail.gmail.com> <7aaed09104102214521e90c27c@mail.gmail.com> <1098485905.1440.11.camel@krustophenia.net> Content-Type: text/plain Message-Id: <1098487302.5963.9.camel@at2.pipehead.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.5 (1.4.5-7) Date: Fri, 22 Oct 2004 18:21:42 -0500 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 730 Lines: 23 On Fri, 2004-10-22 at 17:58, Lee Revell wrote: > Part of the reasoning behind the new development model is that if you > want a stable kernel, there are many vendors who will give you one. Precisely what I was thinking: Features pass a utility/sanity/style check to get into main line, and vendors provide the polished/tuned package. > If you want to make an omelette you have > to break some eggs... 2.6.9 left a few shells on the floor ;-) -- Paul Fulghum paulkf@microgate.com - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/