Date: Fri, 22 Oct 2004 16:21:23 -0700
From: William Lee Irwin III <wli@holomorphy.com>
To: Espen Fjellv?r Olsen <espenfjo@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: My thoughts on the "new development model"
Message-ID: <20041022232123.GF17038@holomorphy.com>
References: <7aaed09104102213032c0d7415@mail.gmail.com> <7aaed09104102214521e90c27c@mail.gmail.com> <20041022224540.GE17038@holomorphy.com> <7aaed091041022155058d6135c@mail.gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <7aaed091041022155058d6135c@mail.gmail.com>
Organization: The Domain of Holomorphy
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040722i
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 904
Lines: 21

On Fri, 22 Oct 2004 15:45:40 -0700, William Lee Irwin III wrote:
>> We should write code, not blow release nomenclature smoke.

On Sat, Oct 23, 2004 at 12:50:44AM +0200, Espen Fjellv?r Olsen wrote:
> I'm sorry i cant contribute with any code, i'm not skilled enough to
> do such a job, yet.
> The only way i can contribute is to do testing, a release need
> testing, testing and testing :)

Isn't this just what motivates what's in the next release? If the
patches weren't tested, why were they merged? Accidents can't be
anticipated. How long are you going to wait for one to happen?
Why expect one not to happen if you wait on the same code longer?


-- wli
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/