DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws;
        s=beta; d=gmail.com;
        h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
        b=e/QUU/NW4noZztNeZsCSkRE1zDejPqR/lSqVBa5T9W9ehyd60pfhOumhcVd/63a15A1Gv4EVvgv8idKoQ6AEKiOjZP/8brmOSv6fSyDHv4FN9tFgp07oD5Oj1qtNMg/zGFJRGuDAECwUaWGsxiJGkmnlfY1RiQSokUuB5DMYaDo=
Message-ID: <7aaed09104102213032c0d7415@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 22 Oct 2004 22:03:00 +0200
From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Espen_Fjellv=E6r_Olsen?= <espenfjo@gmail.com>
Reply-To: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Espen_Fjellv=E6r_Olsen?= <espenfjo@gmail.com>
To: linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: My thoughts on the "new development model"(A bit late tho)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 966
Lines: 26

This may come a bit late now, since the "new development model" was
put through late this summer.
But anyway i'm going to come with som thoughts about it.

I think that 2.6 should be frozen from now on, just security related
stuff should be merged.
This would strengthen Linux's reputation as a stable and secure
system, not a unstable and a system just used for fun.
A 2.7 should be created where all new experimental stuff is merged
into it, and where people could begin to think new again.
New thoughts are good in all ways, it is for sure very much code in
the current kernels that should be revised, rewritten and maybe marked
as deprecated.

:)

-- 
Mvh / Best regards
Espen Fjellv?r Olsen
espenfjo@gmail.com
Norway
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/