Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S265971AbUJWIBq (ORCPT ); Sat, 23 Oct 2004 04:01:46 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S266703AbUJWIBq (ORCPT ); Sat, 23 Oct 2004 04:01:46 -0400 Received: from vs152245.vserver.de ([62.75.152.245]:58264 "EHLO vs152245.vserver.de") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S265971AbUJWIBo convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Sat, 23 Oct 2004 04:01:44 -0400 From: Boris Bukowski Reply-To: b.bukowski@gmx.de To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: My thoughts on the "new development model" Date: Sat, 23 Oct 2004 10:01:32 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.7 References: <7aaed09104102213032c0d7415@mail.gmail.com> <7aaed09104102214521e90c27c@mail.gmail.com> <1098485905.1440.11.camel@krustophenia.net> In-Reply-To: <1098485905.1440.11.camel@krustophenia.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200410231001.32080.b.bukowski@gmx.de> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1790 Lines: 36 Am Saturday, 23. October 2004 00:58 schrieb Lee Revell: > On Fri, 2004-10-22 at 23:52 +0200, Espen Fjellv?r Olsen wrote: > > I think that 2.6 should be frozen from now on, just security related > > stuff should be merged. > > This would strengthen Linux's reputation as a stable and secure > > system, not a unstable and a system just used for fun. > > My $0.02: > > Part of the reasoning behind the new development model is that if you > want a stable kernel, there are many vendors who will give you one. The I don't trust them :) > new dev model is partially driven by vendors and developers desire to > get their features into mainline quicker. There is an inherent > stability cost associated with this, but the price is only paid by users > who want stability AND the latest kernel.org kernel. The big players > all seem to agree that the new development model better suits users and > their own needs. The distros are in a better position to determine what > constitutes a stable kernel anyway, they have millions of users to test > on. Let the vendors AND the kernel hackers do what they are each best > at. Vendors are interested in making money, kernel hackers are interested in bringing the kernel forward, Admins are interested in keeping their Servers up. It looks like we need a Community driven Enterprise Kernel. We decided to start testing with 2.6.10 and use it if there are no Problems. Maybe there are other Admins doing the same and we can start our own Enterprise Kernel. Sombody interested in such a Project? Boris - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/