Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sun, 22 Apr 2001 09:00:57 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sun, 22 Apr 2001 09:00:47 -0400 Received: from pc57-cam4.cable.ntl.com ([62.253.135.57]:39299 "EHLO kings-cross.london.uk.eu.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Sun, 22 Apr 2001 09:00:36 -0400 X-Mailer: exmh version 2.3.1 01/18/2001 (debian 2.3.1-1) with nmh-1.0.4+dev To: Alan Cox cc: junio@siamese.dhis.twinsun.com, manuel@mclure.org (Manuel McLure), linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Linux 2.4.3-ac12 In-Reply-To: Message from Alan Cox of "Sun, 22 Apr 2001 13:54:28 BST." In-Reply-To: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Sun, 22 Apr 2001 14:00:19 +0100 From: Philip Blundell Message-Id: Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org >> >Why ? It works in the 2.96 snapshots. So 2.96+ is fine. >> >> GCC snapshots have called themselves 2.97 since last September. "2.96" just >> means that it's some random old version. Yours happens to work; there's no >> guarantee that everybody else's will too. > >2.97+ are also all random snapshots most of which dont actually work. Im >obviously missing a point here. Are you being deliberately obtuse? 2.97+ snapshots do all support builtin_expect, which is what we were discussing. p. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/