Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261240AbUJWQ50 (ORCPT ); Sat, 23 Oct 2004 12:57:26 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261243AbUJWQ50 (ORCPT ); Sat, 23 Oct 2004 12:57:26 -0400 Received: from nysv.org ([213.157.66.145]:22920 "EHLO nysv.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261240AbUJWQ5Y (ORCPT ); Sat, 23 Oct 2004 12:57:24 -0400 Date: Sat, 23 Oct 2004 19:57:12 +0300 To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: reiserfs-list@namesys.com Subject: Re: 2.6.9-mm1 Message-ID: <20041023165712.GR26192@nysv.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <417A7EF9.70007@namesys.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i From: mjt@nysv.org (Markus =?ISO-8859-1?Q?=20T=F6rnqvist?=) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 723 Lines: 21 Hans Reiser wrote: >Please make large keys the default, and hide the ability to >choose small keys by taking it out of the configuration menu and burying >it in a .h file. Stupid question, why have small keys at all? Someone said once that he didn't want to use large keys because they added no value to him and small keys wasted less space. If there are people like this around, burying it is not cool, but if there aren't, maybe small keys should be ripped out? -- mjt - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/