Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261298AbUJWUCm (ORCPT ); Sat, 23 Oct 2004 16:02:42 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261296AbUJWUCR (ORCPT ); Sat, 23 Oct 2004 16:02:17 -0400 Received: from mail-relay-1.tiscali.it ([213.205.33.41]:62160 "EHLO mail-relay-1.tiscali.it") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261298AbUJWUBD (ORCPT ); Sat, 23 Oct 2004 16:01:03 -0400 Date: Sat, 23 Oct 2004 21:58:11 +0200 From: Kronos To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: espenfjo@gmail.com, Adrian Bunk Subject: Re: My thoughts on the "new development model" Message-ID: <20041023195811.GA11735@dreamland.darkstar.lan> Reply-To: kronos@kronoz.cjb.net Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20041023014004.GG22558@stusta.de> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040907i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 895 Lines: 21 Adrian Bunk ha scritto: > IMHO Andrew+Linus should open a short-living 2.7 tree soon and Andrew > (or someone else) should maintain a 2.6 tree with less changes Suppose that Linus or Andrew starts a new tree to develop some new and and very big and intrusive feature. Once it's done the tree will be merged back with 2.6 (should be easy with bk) or will become 2.8? Just Curious. Luca -- Home: http://kronoz.cjb.net "L'abilita` politica e` l'abilita` di prevedere quello che accadra` domani, la prossima settimana, il prossimo mese e l'anno prossimo. E di essere cosi` abili, piu` tardi, da spiegare perche' non e` accaduto." - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/